ISO 22392-2020 pdf download.Security and resilience一Community resilience一Guidelines for conducting peer reviews.
4.2 Decide the level of administration to be peer reviewed
Peer reviews can be an effective approach to reflect cat the activities being conducted at any level of admin,itration, The host clirnild decide whether the peer ruvww should focus on the national, regional, local or organizationI levels.
More than one level of administration may be the focus of the peer review, in which case, the amount of tune available for the peer review should be Increased to reflect the added complexity.
4.3 Agree the expected benefits of the peer review
The peer review should have expected benefits for the host and for reviewers and these should be agreed before organizing the peer review to provide clear expected impacts from the outconws of the review.
There should be expected benefits for each selected analysis area (see 43) to ensure clarity of the measurable Improvement being sought.
The host and reviewers should define each of their expected benefits. This should:
— agree with their interested parties the benefits they expect from participating in the review (e.g. benefits to their performance, analysis areas, or oilier benefits such as learning or networking);
— describe each benefit and identify the benefit owner who is responcsle for it (i.e who will: plan the timing of changes to deliver the benefit; prepare the contest for the changes; implement the changes; manage the changes to avoid negative side-effects);
— define the ob$e.ctives (see 4.4) that support each benefit;
— Identify a measure of rich brnfit. enduding a current vilur for the measure and a target change in the value as a result of the peer review: ita benefit is not measurable directly, then a proxy measure should hr identified;
— communicate information on benefits to eadi other (I.e. the reviewers should communicate their expectations to the host. and vice versa)
— consider these expectations when planning the peer review process (see &3) to ensure all expecLitions are addressed.
4.4 Agree the objectives of the peer review
The host should agree dear objectives for the peer review in terms of how ii will deliver the benefits (see 4.3) and strengthen its perlorniance in selected analysis areas (see 43). Objectives should include how the peer review should enhance analysis areas en terms of:
— strategy. visn and leadership; this should include developing the culture and strategies;
— collection and use of Information; this should lnciwie developing the analyses of external and internal data and information, building strategic collaborations, exploring the wider enviroOlnent, and foreseeing future risk;;
— management of systcnls, processes, planning and audits; this should include developing the management structure, planning processes, sustainable resource manesnent. analysing corporate flsks. functions that support operaflonal delivery, business Continuity, performance measurement. external audits, and learning from itsclf and others.ISO 22392 pdf download.